Read the original article here.

---

Okay, here is the detailed educational resource on Influence Operations, framed within the context of "The Dead Internet Files: How Bots Silently Replaced Us."

---

Understanding Influence Operations in the Age of the "Dead Internet"

Influence Operations (IO) are not a new phenomenon; they have been employed by states, organizations, and individuals throughout history to shape perceptions and behaviors. However, the advent of the internet, particularly social media and the increasing sophistication of automation and artificial intelligence, has dramatically transformed the landscape of influence. The concept of the "Dead Internet Files," suggesting a digital world increasingly populated and dominated by bots and automated content rather than genuine human interaction, provides a critical lens through which to understand modern influence operations and their unprecedented scale and potential impact.

This resource explores the nature of influence operations, their methods, actors, and goals, with a specific focus on how the suspected decline in authentic human online activity and the rise of automated agents (bots) enable and amplify these efforts, potentially contributing to the scenario described by "The Dead Internet Files."

---

1. What Are Influence Operations?

At its core, an influence operation is a deliberate, coordinated effort to alter the perceptions, beliefs, attitudes, and ultimately the behavior of a target audience. These operations can range from subtle persuasion to overt manipulation and coercion, often employing a combination of public communication, psychological tactics, and technological means.

Definition: Influence Operations (IO) Deliberate, coordinated, and covert or overt actions taken to affect the perceptions, attitudes, and behaviors of target audiences, groups, or individuals. IO aims to achieve specific political, military, or informational objectives, often without the target audience realizing their beliefs or actions are being manipulated.

Historically, influence operations relied on traditional media like radio, television, print, and face-to-face interactions. The digital age, however, has provided new, powerful, and often clandestine channels for influence, where distinguishing between authentic human activity and automated or centrally controlled narratives is increasingly challenging – a key tenet of the "Dead Internet Files" idea.

---

2. Key Concepts and Terminology

Understanding influence operations requires familiarity with related terms often used in this context:

Definition: Propaganda Information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. While often associated with negative connotations, propaganda can also be used for public health campaigns or national unity, but its defining feature is its intent to persuade towards a specific agenda.

Definition: Disinformation False information that is deliberately created and spread in order to deceive people. Unlike misinformation (false information spread without intent to deceive, often due to error), disinformation is malicious in intent and is a primary tool used in influence operations.

Definition: Misinformation False or inaccurate information that is spread, regardless of intent. While not always part of a deliberate influence operation, misinformation can be easily amplified by IO tactics (including bots) and contribute to the erosion of trust and understanding.

Definition: Psychological Operations (PSYOP) Planned operations to convey selected information and indicators to foreign audiences to influence their emotions, motives, objective reasoning, and ultimately, the behavior of foreign governments, organizations, groups, and individuals. PSYOP is a military term often overlapping significantly with influence operations aimed at affecting an adversary or potential adversary.

Definition: Information Operations (IO - Broader Military Context) Actions taken to affect adversary information and information systems while defending one's own information and information systems. In this broader military sense, Information Operations encompasses not just influence (affecting perceptions) but also electronic warfare, cyber operations, and operations security – all of which can support or be part of influence operations.

---

3. Methods and Tactics in the Digital Age

Modern influence operations leverage the architecture and dynamics of the internet. The potential presence of a "Dead Internet" – a digital landscape dominated by automated activity – makes certain methods particularly effective:

• Social Media Manipulation: Creating fake accounts, profiles, and pages (often automated or "bot farms") to:

  • Amplify specific messages (posts, hashtags, links).
  • Create the illusion of widespread support or opposition (astroturfing).
  • Spread disinformation rapidly.
  • Harass or silence dissenting voices.
  • Manipulate trending topics and algorithms.
  • Context for Dead Internet: If a significant portion of online activity is automated, bots can easily overwhelm genuine human conversations, making it difficult for real users to discern authentic trends or popular opinions from manufactured ones.

• Content Creation and Amplification: Producing fabricated news articles, doctored images, deepfake videos, and persuasive text using generative AI, then using bot networks or compromised accounts to disseminate this content widely across various platforms.

  • Context for Dead Internet: AI-generated content can be produced at scale and indistinguishable from human-created material. Bots can then distribute this content tirelessly, flooding the internet with synthetic information that mimics real conversations and news feeds.

• Targeted Messaging: Using data analytics to identify specific groups or individuals and tailoring influence messages to their interests, biases, and vulnerabilities.

  • Context for Dead Internet: While targeting is often human-driven, bots can be used to find target audiences based on their online behavior (e.g., identifying accounts that interact with specific keywords or hashtags) and then deliver tailored messages or content directly to them or to communities they frequent.

• Narrative Control: Actively promoting a specific narrative while simultaneously suppressing or discrediting alternative viewpoints. This can involve flooding platforms with pro-narrative content (via bots and fake accounts) and reporting or downranking counter-narrative content.

  • Context for Dead Internet: Bots can create an overwhelming volume of content supporting a narrative, making it seem omnipresent and potentially drowning out human voices expressing different opinions.

• Cyber-Enabled Operations: Using hacking, phishing, or other cyber tactics to:

  • Steal sensitive information for leaking (e.g., emails, documents) to embarrass or discredit targets.
  • Disrupt websites or communication channels (Denial-of-Service attacks) to silence opponents or prevent the spread of counter-narratives.
  • Compromise legitimate accounts for use in influence operations.
  • Context for Dead Internet: While not exclusively bot-driven, cyber tactics often support online influence by providing content or disrupting channels, clearing the way for automated amplification of specific messages.

---

4. The Role of Automation and Bots: The "Dead Internet" Connection

The rise of sophisticated bots and automated systems is central to understanding the scale and nature of modern influence operations, particularly within the framework of the "Dead Internet" thesis.

• Scale and Speed: Bots can perform tasks – creating accounts, posting messages, sharing content, commenting – at a speed and scale impossible for human operators. A single human team can manage thousands, even millions, of automated accounts to execute a campaign across numerous platforms simultaneously. This allows IO campaigns to generate massive online activity very quickly, giving the appearance of widespread organic trends or opinions.

• Amplification: Bots are often used to artificially boost the visibility of content. They can retweet, like, share, comment, and watch videos repeatedly, driving content higher in algorithms and making it appear more popular and credible than it is. This creates a feedback loop where algorithmic systems, designed to promote engagement, inadvertently promote bot-driven content, pushing it into the feeds of real users.

• Mimicry and Deception: Advanced bots are designed to appear more human. They can have profiles with generated photos, post content with grammatical errors or slang, engage in basic conversations, and even evolve their behavior based on interactions. This makes manual detection harder and contributes to the sense that online spaces are populated by increasingly indistinguishable human and non-human entities – the core visual of a "Dead Internet."

• Creating Illusion of Consensus/Astroturfing: By having many bot accounts post similar messages or interact positively with a specific narrative, influence operators can create the false impression that a particular viewpoint is widely held or that a product/person is genuinely popular.

  Definition: Astroturfing The deceptive practice of masking the sponsors of a message or organization to make it appear as though it originates from and is supported by a grassroots participant movement. Online, this is frequently achieved using large numbers of fake accounts or bots to simulate genuine public support or opinion.

• Drowning Out Real Voices: The sheer volume of bot-generated or bot-amplified content can make it difficult for genuine human voices and authentic information to be heard, discussed, or found online. This contributes to information overload and can silence or marginalize real human communities, aligning with the "Dead Internet" idea that human interaction is being overshadowed.

In essence, if the "Dead Internet" hypothesis suggests online spaces are increasingly filled with automated activity, influence operations are among the primary forces creating and leveraging this automation to achieve strategic goals. Bots don't just populate the dead internet; they conduct operations within it.

---

5. Actors and Motivations

Who conducts influence operations, and why?

• State Actors: Governments are major players, using IO for geopolitical gain, shaping international opinion, interfering in foreign elections, fostering domestic support, or undermining adversaries. Motivations include national security, foreign policy objectives, and internal stability.
• Political Groups: Parties, campaigns, and advocacy groups use IO to influence public opinion, mobilize supporters, attack opponents, and win elections or policy debates.
• Corporations: Businesses may employ IO tactics (often disguised as PR or marketing) to promote products, attack competitors, manage crises, or influence regulatory environments.
• Non-State Actors: Terrorist groups, extremist organizations, and ideological movements use IO for recruitment, radicalization, fundraising, spreading propaganda, and coordinating actions.
• Individuals/Hacktivists: Individuals or small groups may conduct IO for personal fame, ideological reasons, or as a form of protest.

---

6. Targets and Goals

Influence operations can target a wide range of entities for various outcomes:

• Target Audiences: The general public, specific demographics (e.g., voters, ethnic groups, age brackets), policymakers, journalists, military personnel, or key opinion leaders.
• Goals:
  • Political: Swaying elections, influencing policy decisions, fostering unrest, strengthening political alliances.
  • Military: Undermining enemy morale, deceiving adversaries about intentions, gaining public support for military actions.
  • Economic: Manipulating stock prices, damaging competitor reputations, influencing consumer behavior, disrupting markets.
  • Social/Cultural: Fostering polarization, spreading ideological narratives, damaging trust in institutions, inciting social unrest.

---

7. Detecting and Countering Influence Operations

Detecting IO, especially those employing sophisticated bots and automation in a potentially "dead" digital environment, is challenging but crucial.

• Technical Detection:
  • Bot Detection: Identifying automated accounts based on behavioral patterns (posting frequency, timing, content repetition, network structure), account characteristics (creation date, profile completeness), and technical data (IP addresses, user agents). However, advanced bots mimic human behavior, making this difficult.
  • Network Analysis: Mapping connections and interactions between accounts to identify coordinated activity, even if individual accounts appear somewhat human.
  • Content Analysis: Identifying patterns in language, themes, hashtags, and shared links across large sets of content that suggest central coordination.
• Human Analysis:
  • Investigative Journalism: Uncovering networks and operators behind campaigns through traditional reporting.
  • Fact-Checking: Verifying the veracity of claims and narratives being spread.
  • OSINT (Open Source Intelligence): Analyzing publicly available information to identify suspicious patterns and actors.
• Platform Actions: Social media companies and online service providers can:
  • Remove fake accounts and coordinated networks.
  • Label potentially inauthentic content or accounts.
  • Adjust algorithms to reduce the amplification of manipulative content.
  • Increase transparency about account ownership and advertising.
• Media Literacy and Critical Thinking: Educating the public on how to identify potential manipulation, question sources, and understand online dynamics is a vital long-term countermeasure.
• Policy and Regulation: Governments and international bodies may implement laws against online manipulation and coordinate efforts to expose foreign influence operations.

Challenges in a "Dead Internet" Context: The difficulty in distinguishing human from bot activity makes detection harder. The sheer volume of automated content can overwhelm human analysis and fact-checking efforts. Bots can adapt quickly to detection methods, entering an arms race with platform security.

---

8. Conclusion: Influence Operations in a Bot-Filled World

Influence operations have evolved dramatically with the internet, becoming faster, wider-reaching, and more complex. The rise of automation, particularly sophisticated bots and AI, has enabled a scale of manipulation previously unimaginable. If the premise of "The Dead Internet Files" – that the internet is increasingly dominated by automated or centrally controlled activity – holds true, then the environment becomes incredibly fertile ground for influence operations. Bots can easily masquerade as genuine users, create artificial popularity, drown out authentic discourse, and spread tailored disinformation relentlessly.

Understanding influence operations in this context is crucial. It requires recognizing that a significant portion of online activity may not be genuine human interaction but orchestrated influence leveraging automated systems. Combating these operations requires a multi-faceted approach: technical detection, human analysis, platform responsibility, and, perhaps most importantly, a critically engaged public aware of the potential for manipulation in an online world potentially silent of authentic human voices, replaced instead by automated influence.

---